A Letter from Father to His Daughter

The father in case is Richard Dawkins and the letter is here. A beautiful one indeed. The most valuable piece of advice a daughter can get from a father.

One of the snippets:

I want to try to explain why tradition is so important to us. All animals are built (by the process called evolution) to survive in the normal place in which their kind live. Lions are built to be good at surviving on the plains of Africa. Crayfish to be good at surviving in fresh, water, while lobsters are built to be good at surviving in the salt sea. People are animals, too, and we are built to be good at surviving in a world full of ….. other people. Most of us don’t hunt for our own food like lions or lobsters; we buy it from other people who have bought it from yet other people. We ”swim” through a “sea of people.” Just as a fish needs gills to survive in water, people need brains that make them able to deal with other people. Just as the sea is full of salt water, the sea of people is full of difficult things to learn. Like language.

You speak English, but your friend Ann-Kathrin speaks German. You each speak the language that fits you to ‘`swim about” in your own separate “people sea.” Language is passed down by tradition. There is no other way . In England, Pepe is a dog. In Germany he is ein Hund. Neither of these words is more correct, or more true than the other. Both are simply handed down. In order to be good at “swimming about in their people sea,” children have to learn the language of their own country, and lots of other things about their own people; and this means that they have to absorb, like blotting paper, an enormous amount of traditional information. (Remember that traditional information just means things that are handed down from grandparents to parents to children.) The child’s brain has to be a sucker for traditional information. And the child can’t be expected to sort out good and useful traditional information, like the words of a language, from bad or silly traditional information, like believing in witches and devils and ever-living virgins.

It’s a pity, but it can’t help being the case, that because children have to be suckers for traditional information, they are likely to believe anything the grown-ups tell them, whether true or false, right or wrong. Lots of what the grown-ups tell them is true and based on evidence, or at least sensible. But if some of it is false, silly, or even wicked, there is nothing to stop the children believing that, too. Now, when the children grow up, what do they do? Well, of course, they tell it to the next generation of children. So, once something gets itself strongly believed – even if it is completely untrue and there never was any reason to believe it in the first place – it can go on forever.

QoTD

So let’s see your battle scars then. Show me the wounds you’ve endured as a result of pursuing goals you couldn’t achieve. Let’s see that bankruptcy, that broken heart, the rejection letter, the lawsuit, the divorce, the public humiliation. Show me the total failures, the brutal disappointments, the smack-downs.

- Steve Pavlina

Six Pillars of Influence

David Armano has an interesting post on the six pillars of influence. They make much much sense to me. In short, these are the five pillars:

Reach
Proximity
Expertise
Relevancy
Credibility
Trust

QoTD

The trick is to accept the now you will not be the person facing those choices, it will be the future you – a person who can’t be trusted. Future-you will give in, and then you’ll go back to being now-you and feel weak and ashamed. Now-you must trick future-you into doing what is right for both parties.

here.

QoTD

Education is an active process of constructing ideas rather than a passive process of absorbing information.

- from this book.

India’s Growth will Outpace that of China’s?

I always hear these things everywhere. Mostly from outside sources like The Economist etc. They talk about demography, they talk about GDP, they talk about such similar things.

All being said, still 70% of India’s population live in villages. All of these “happenings” are not inclusive of them – all they have are typical labor skills and agricultural skills. And I dont think China’s growth is not inclusive of such majority of its population.

Unless the growth of the country is inclusive of this 70% of population, I am afraid, we are going to make the disparity between poor and rich large in this country.

Set of Questions by Neil Postman

  • What is the problem to which this technology is a solution?
  • Whose problem is this?
  • What new problems might be created by solving this problem with this technology?
  • What changes in language are being imposed by this new technology and what is gained and lost in this change?

A good set of videos to watch.

Modi Has Some Sense

To get something from mother earth you have to give something back. If you don’t, it will stop giving you. It’s not a one-way cycle.
Narendra Modi, Chief Minister, Gujarat

Some Sad Facts About Carlton Tower Mishap

From The Hindu (emphasis mine):

  • …the doors leading to the open terrace were locked resulting in a stampede as they rushed back down the stairs.
  • Panicking, four persons, including a young woman, jumped from the seventh floor windows and lost their lives.
  • …the terrace doors were locked to prevent the staff and customers of the various restaurants from using the space to consume alcohol.
  • “They lost their lives because they were confused.”
  • They demanded a building plan which led to heated arguments with an angry public.

This makes me remember those beautiful words from The Myst, which I wrote about earlier.

Noticed Something Today

I was watching Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Little Champs 2010 program in Zee Telugu today. Some kids (11 yr old kids) really sang well. All the judges were giving comments on how the starting, ending, landing notes could be done better. The audience in general acknowledge this and agree with their comments.

Imagine a similar situation where somebody is thinking aloud in front of judges and audience and after s/he is done, the judges identify flaws in his thinking, comment on how he could have thought better, how different reasons and facts could have been juxtaposed better, how open mindedness, fairness, rationality and other such finer things could have interplayed better and audience agreeing with it.

I am just dreaming, but the point I want to drive home is that the way people demand rigor in somethings like music, beauty, etc. does not even compare with what they expect of thinking. May be because, the former is related to senses and the later is related to cortex – which has only recently evolved. May be in future, thinking will be as natural as sensing for people. Are we moving towards that direction?

« Older entries Newer entries »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.